WS-Security-based framework for Web services security solutions
The example above is an entry-level WS-Security architecture.
Research on the Grid Security Technologies Based on the WS-Security Specifications
signencr: WS-Security signing of body and headers, with timestamp, and encryption of body
The WS-Security configuration error will no longer occur in the console logs.
Another way of cutting the performance cost of WS-Security is to offload the security processing onto specialized hardware.
By using Web services standards, such as WS-ReliableMessaging and WS-Security, you can use Synapse to enable secure, reliable connections between applications.
This architecture USES WS-Security to provide end-to-end security and possibly non-repudiation (if the service persists the inbound message before removing security).
Of course, writing WS-Security in E4X, while possible, would probably not be much fun (we didn't try it yet!).
To do this, apply the WS-Security standard to indicate which bit of the message has been hashed.
If you want to propagate your security information only as far as a particular intermediary, you can address a particular WS-Security header to that actor.
In all these scenarios, you can use the higher-level Web service protocols such as WS-Addressing and WS-Security, which give you flexible routing schemes and secure interactions, respectively.
WS-Security USES XML signature to ensure that data has not been tampered with in transit, because any tampering would invalidate the signature.
The authors start by providing a thorough introduction to the WS-Security standards and discuss important topics such as auditing, authorization and user identity propagation.
Today, most large systems are based on the notion of interoperability of autonomous applications through Web service standards (such as SOAP, WS-Security, and the like).
signencr：主体和头部的WS-Security 签名，使用时间戳和主体加密
You need to do this because the WS-Security specification allows attaching multiple tokens for authentication, thus additional metadata is required to identify which is the primary security token.
The client domain gateway expects a request message with an LTPA token in a Web services security (WS-Security) header as generated by the configuration described in Part 4 of this series.
Listing 8 shows a pair of the namespace version-specific bindings referenced by elements in the Listing 7 binding, one for a WS-Policy namespace and one for a WS-SecurityPolicy namespace.
