The thesis may at first strike one as extreme, But substantial evidence exists to support it.
But substantial evidence supports the more modest proposition that high marginal tax rates discourage people from working to their full potential.
Of course, the substantial evidence test becomes meaningful only in conjunction with a substantive standard against which the agency's fact findings will be evaluated.
In reviewing agency findings under the substantial evidence test, the court is obliged to consider the "whole record." Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951).
The Universal Camera decision relied on these provisions in explaining the proper role of the ALJ's decision during judicial review: The substantial evidence test applies to the agency's decision, not the ALJ's.
This text passed the method of substantial evidence to carry on a research detection: System factor, win a label rate and can circulate a new an amount to publish price to all suppress the influence.
